QueenCedar101 wrote:CosTaSsSs wrote:QueenCedar101 wrote:CosTaSsSs wrote:
No, I like that it isn't live since it can be filmed altogether and doesn't take a lot of time of her schedule.
Understandable, but it could spike-up ratings and increase the chance of longevity, even if the voting system is rigged. It's why AGT has lasted for so long. Going fast does not always make the best results. There were a lot of complaints last year of people saying they won't watch again, all because their fave didn't win. We'll see based off the ratings. At the end of the day, this is a dance comeptition. Not everyone can win. rather get over it or don't watch. Simple.
What they could do is have the first two seasons build a loyal audience, and then make it live! I think that if they go for a third season, it would be better to make it live but they will need better judges. They should bring guest judges and replace some, Usher, Ciara and Janet would be amazing.
That could work. It depends on whether viewership is lost or gained. Ciara and possibly Janet might be good, but Usher? I don't think him and J.Lo can stand each other.
They have been together at certain events and they have been photographed. I don't think they talk often, but Usher has been dancing a lot in his videos/perfomances and he would be suitable for such a show. Chris Brown could also be a judge.